In my early days of birding, I quickly took an interest in raptor watching. It helped that there was a large, predominantly grassland mixed with some casuarina trees site in Changi/Tanah Merah that had been reclaimed for future use as Terminal 5 airport. It was left to lie fallow temporarily. For a brief period of a year or so, I was able to drive in with my saloon car to look for raptors and grassland birds on my own.
One morning, on 8th November 2012, I saw what seemed to be a sparrowhawk-sized bird on a perch and took a few photos. It was heavily backlit, and I didn’t manage to see many features. I went on my merry way to look for other birds soon after, and upon returning home, I transferred six almost identical shots to my computer. They were horribly underexposed. A cursory look led me to think they were worth keeping in mind, but at that time, I had a “Big Year” to deal with and many other birds still to find.
It was over two weeks later that I went back to have a closer look at the images. I couldn’t be certain of the identification, so I posted them in a Facebook group looking for answers. Two more experienced birders mentioned Crested Goshawk which, to be fair, would be the most similar-looking bird. I did not pursue the matter further as, again, I was on a Big Year quest; my identification skills were pretty rudimentary then, and I already had a Crested Goshawk on my list.
SG BIG YEAR BIRDERS FB Group post (private)

About a year later, I founded a Facebook group called Bird Sightings. By then, I was a bit more experienced, and the group included even more seasoned birders. That bird was still in the back of my mind, and I decided to post the photo again, looking for a fresh ID. The thinking at the time was to find the closest fit, and in this case, the answer was a female Japanese Sparrowhawk. Now, let’s be clear: it was 2013, and many of us in Singapore had limited exposure to sparrowhawks and other raptors, and even less to perched ones. The reclaimed land had been closed to the public by then and opportunities to get first hand knowledge was limited. We were all learning together (and, of course, still are), and it would take another few years before some of us ventured to Thailand to study the various sparrowhawks up close and in big numbers.
Bird Sightings FB Group post (public)

Years passed, and on 21st November 2019 at Jelutong Tower, Alex Fok, a birder friend of mine, took a few shots of an interesting raptor passing by that turned out to be a Shikra. That got everyone excited, and with that record, the species was finally included in our local checklist. It had been speculated a few years prior that one could fly over, and here was solid evidence that one eventually did. Moving forward, the Shikra and its identification were things local birders needed to be aware of. I was a bit bummed because Jelutong Tower was my birding headquarters and I had missed the bird when it arrived. But life goes on, especially since a few weeks earlier, I had seen the Fairy Pitta with Richard White at nearby Dillenia Hut. That was a highly coveted bird and a first record for Singapore as well.
Finally, to bring the story to its conclusion, sometime in February 2021, I was looking through my photo archive (after someone asked me for a Common Buzzard photo I took back in 2012 at the same site) and came across the six sparrowhawk photos I had kept all those years. The intervening years had been a good learning process for everyone involved in the local raptor-watching scene, myself included. When I looked closely at those photos, I was pretty sure I had photographed a Shikra all those years ago. I immediately posted the images in two places to seek other opinions. More experienced birders confirmed the identification: I indeed had a Shikra. It was, in fact, the first photographic evidence of the species in Singapore. And it only took nine years to prove it. Better late than never!
Singapore Raptors FB Group post (private)

Postscript:
All the six photos are of almost identical pose. All the resulting processed photos were also processed slightly differently but it’s hard to recover a badly lit and shot photo, no matter how many variations in processing were undertaken.

